|
  My work focuses on dynamical and multi scale approaches of the relationships between
organisms and their environment. My main activities aim to describe and understand the effects of climate change on
aquatic ecosystems. A first part thus deals with analysis of existing biological and environmental time series. More generally,
a second part of my work aim to a better understanding of ecological temporal processes. If more theoretical and not
directly related to the global warming, this second part could help identifying ecological processes implied in the observed
responses of ecosystems to climate change.
1. Observed effects of climate change on community structures:
  Studies addressing the effect of global warming on freshwater ecosystems are still scares and mainly focused on lakes. Part of my work
consists in studying the influence of climate change on fish and invertebrates community structures in large rivers.
• Effects
of the gradual atmospheric warming:
|
  Using multivariate analysis and statistical methods appropriate for
autocorrelated time series, I have shown that climate change has
significantly influenced the fish and invertebrate community
structures of the Upper Rhône River (Daufresne et
al. 2004). To expand this study, I then attempted to compare such
effect across 7 fish communities of the main French large rivers,
undergoing different kinds of non-climatic anthropogenic
pressures. These analyses involved species traits and combine (to
my knowledge for the first time) both
meta-analysis and temporal autocorrelations (Daufresne and
Boët submitted). We showed that, despite effects of non-climatic pressures, fish community structures were globally strongly influenced by climate change. |

|
• Effects of extreme climatic events:
  Beside the effects of the atmospheric gradual warming, I also focused on
effects of extreme climatic events, and especially of the European
2003 heatwave. We observed a deep effect of the heatwave on
mollusc community structure of the Saône River
(Mouthon and Daufresne 2006). Because
occurrence of such event should increase (consequently to climate
change), our study revealed that, during this century, more than
half the mollusc species currently inhabiting the potamic
area of large rivers are directly threatened with disappearance. A study, performed currently at the species level, should enable a
better understanding of such processes (Mouthon and Daufresne
submitted).
|
  A recent study (Daufresne et al. 2007) underlined the
cumulative effects of gradual warming and extreme climatic event
on macroinvertebrate communities of the Rhône at
9 study sites. As already observed, we highlighted gradual changes
in community structures. However, our analyses stressed the
important effects of hydro-climatic events on community dynamics.
The most important changes in community structures was due to the
2003 heatwave. More specifically, we clearly documented that all
strong hydro-climatic events (floods, heatwave) systematically led
to the development of eury-tolerant and invasive taxa. Contrary to
expectations, we did not observe any sign of recovery and the relative
sensitivity of communities to extreme hydro-climatic events seemed to increase
with time. As a consequence, predicting changes in the dynamics of
communities seem difficult in the context of global warming.
Beside a gradual change in community structures, we emphasized
that even slight hydro-climatic event could produce drastic shift
in macroinvertebrate communities. |

|
2. Dynamical ecological processes:
• Limitation, regulation and fluctuations of populations:
  The main purpose of this work was to understand non-consistent effects
of environment variables on population dynamics at the inter-annual vs long-term
scale. We previously showed (Daufresne et al. 2004) that such pattern has been observed
for the relationship between dace population and temperature during reproduction.
I have chosen to work on brown trout because the ecology of this species is
particularly well documented.
|
  We developed a simple matrix population dynamics model to analyse the
relative influence of biotic and abiotic factors on population dynamics
(Daufresne and Renault 2006). We showed that density-dependent (regulation)
and density-independent processes could act together to control and optimised
population size (limitation) and stability of equilibrium. We also show that
endogenous regulatory processes may often be invisible when analysing abundance
fluctuations at the inter-annual scale. Our work underlines the difficulties to
identify long-term effects of environmental constraints (e.g. climate change)
on population dynamics analysing abundance inter-annual fluctuations. |

|
• Limitation, regulation and fluctuations of populations:
  A third part of my
activities deals with temporal stability of communities. In
collaboration with D.O. Hessen (University of
Oslo), I am currently trying to identify factors controlling
temporal stability of phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in
Norwegian lakes. Using PLS regressions, we showed that temporal
stability of phytoplankton communities was negatively related to
the total phosphorus concentrations. Temporal stability of
zooplankton communities was positively related to specific
richness, habitat availability and temporal stability of
phytoplankton communities and negatively related to total
phytoplankton abundance.
  The ultimate aim of this work is to identify
the factors controlling the relative responses of communities to
climate change. Using large data set, meta-analysis and
time-series analysis methods, it sounds interesting, in a second
step, to related the factors stabilising temporal variability of
community structures to the intensity of their changes due to
climate change.
3. Transversal activities:

|
  My statistical background allowed me to collaborate on several other transversal subjects.
Most of them dealt with dynamical patterns but are not closely related to long-term changes
(see list of publication). I have in particular worked on relationships between individual
behaviours and timing of environmental constraints (by an experimental approach, see Daufresne et al. 2005)
or on the development of goodness of fit (gof) statistics in order to improve the biological
accuracy of the population dynamics model described above. All these activities allowed me to
improve my knowledge on dynamical ecological patterns and to develop new statistical abilities. |
TOP
|